Manual judging on Limetime platform is universal
Use manual judging as the primary method for recording results at small races. You'll no longer need equipment and a team of timekeepers. If you organize large races, combine manual judging with automatic equipment. You can install equipment only at start and finish lines, and record intermediate results manually.
Manual judging is a reliable backup method to equipment. The system ensures high accuracy of results that practically matches automatic timing.
Work of volunteers and judges
Assign judges yourself or invite volunteers using a link or QR code. Judges will be able to quickly respond to non-standard participant actions, intervene promptly and make corrections.
Personal interaction between judges and participants creates a unique atmosphere where people feel support and significance. The event becomes more lively for spectators, which increases their engagement in the process and enhances the overall experience.
Penalty points, penalty time
Manual judging is indispensable in disputed situations. Judges promptly record violations and make objective decisions, assigning penalty time or points depending on the situation.
The Limetime platform has a separate section for penalties. Judges manually record decisions, and the system automatically accounts for this in the final result.
The manual judging function allows testing any race settings by setting arbitrary timing reads. Simulation of real participant reads allows avoiding errors during competitions.
Before competition, you can set start, intermediate checkpoint and finish reads to check how results are recorded for real participants who will participate in the race.
